Board of Directors
Board of Directors
Corporate governance manager establishment, authority, business promotion and further training
Corporate governance manager establishment, authority, business promotion and further training
Management Objectives
Fulfillment Condition
Management Goals And Achievement Status
Number of independent directors exceeds one third of total directors.
Fulfilled
Number of directors holding a concurrent post of manager of the Company shall better not exceed one third of total directors.
Fulfilled
Adequate diversified professional knowledge and skills
Fulfilled
Women account for one-third of board seats
Not Fulfilled
Management Goals And Achievement Status
Title
Name
Gender
Nationality
Age
51 To 60 Years Old
61 To 70 Years Old
71 Years And Older
Seniority Of Independent Director
Less Than 3 Years
3 To 9 Years
More Than 9 Years
Industrial Experience
Semiconductor Products And Materials
Metals And Machinery
Electronic Technology
International Market View
Professional Ability
Industrial Technology
Accounting
Risk Management
Chairman
Wan, Wen-Tsai
Male
Taiwan
61 To 70 Years Old
-
Semiconductor Products And Materials
Metals And Machinery
Electronic Technology
International Market View
Industrial Technology
Risk Management
Vice Chairman
Hong, Chuan-Cheng
Male
HK
61 To 70 Years Old
-
Semiconductor Products And Materials
Metals And Machinery
Electronic Technology
International Market View
Industrial Technology
Risk Management
Director
Pan, Chao-Yi
Female
Taiwan
61 To 70 Years Old
-
Semiconductor Products And Materials
Metals And Machinery
Electronic Technology
International Market View
Industrial Technology
Risk Management
Director
Huang, Jesse
Male
Taiwan
61 To 70 Years Old
-
Semiconductor Products And Materials
Metals And Machinery
Electronic Technology
International Market View
Industrial Technology
Risk Management
Independent Director
Yang, Shun-Ching
Male
Taiwan
61 To 70 Years Old
-
Semiconductor Products And Materials
Metals And Machinery
Electronic Technology
International Market View
Industrial Technology
Risk Management
Independent Director
Su,Erh-Lang
Male
Taiwan
61 To 70 Years Old
-
Semiconductor Products And Materials
Metals And Machinery
Electronic Technology
International Market View
Industrial Technology
Risk Management
Independent Director
Chen,Chih-hung
Male
Taiwan
61 To 70 Years Old
-
Semiconductor Products And Materials
Metals And Machinery
Electronic Technology
International Market View
Industrial Technology
Risk Management
(A)Basis: Provisions of “Rules for Performance Evaluation of Board of Directors” of the
Company
(B)Evaluation method: Internal self-evaluation of the Board of Directors and self-
evaluation of the Board members
(C)Evaluation period: January 1, 2024-December 31, 2024
(D)Evaluation scope: Board of Directors, individual Board members, and functional
committees
(E)Evaluation contents and results:
The evaluation results are presented with 5 grades, and the principles governing
these grades are as follows:
Figure 1: Extremely poor (Strong disagree); figure 2: Poor (Disagree); figure 3:
Medium (Ordinary); figure 4: Excellent (Agree); figure 5: Very excellent (Strongly
agree).
The performance evaluation indicators of the Board of Directors contain 5 aspects. There are 45 indicators in total. The total score was 4.93 points, and it was graded as “Excellent”, indicating: The Board of Directors took duly responsibility for guiding and supervising the corporate strategies, major business, and risk management; the Board of Directors’ decision-making quality was favorable, the overall operation was complete, and the requirements for corporate governance were met.
5 Aspects Of Self-Evaluation
Evaluation Items
Score
Evaluation Items And Scoring Results
A. Participation in the Company’s operation
12 items
4.83
B. Improvement in the Board of Directors’ decision-making quality
12 items
4.92
C. Composition and structure of the Board of Directors
7 items
5.00
D. Election and continuing education of directors
7 items
5.00
E. Internal control
7 items
5.00
Total
45 items
4.93
The performance evaluation indicators of the Board members contain 6 aspects. There are 23 indicators in total. The total score was 4.85 points, and it was graded as “Excellent”, indicating directors’ positive comments on the operating efficiency and effect of each evaluation indicator.
6 Aspects Of Self-Evaluation
Evaluation Items
Score
Evaluation Items And Scoring Results
A. Understanding of the Company’s goals and missions
3 items
4.71
B. Understanding of the directors’ responsibilities
3 items
4.95
C. Participation in the Company’s operation
8 items
4.82
D. Management and communication of internal relations
3 items
4.81
E. Expertise and continuing education of directors
3 items
4.95
F. Internal control
3 items
4.90
Total
23 items
4.85
The performance evaluation indicators of the functional committees contain 5 aspects. There are 23 indicators in total. The total score was 5 points, and it was graded as “Very excellent”, indicating the functional committees’ positive comments on the operating efficiency and effect of each evaluation indicator.
1.Evaluation results of the Audit Committee:
5 Aspects Of Self-Evaluation
Evaluation Items
Score
Evaluation Items And Scoring Results
A. Participation in the Company’s operation
4 items
5.00
B. Understanding of the functional committees’ responsibilities
7 items
5.00
C. Improvement in the functional committees’ decision-making quality
7 items
5.00
D. Composition of the functional committees and election of members
3 items
5.00
E. Internal control
3 items
5.00
Total
24 items
5.00
2.Evaluation results of the Remuneration Committee:
5 Aspects Of Self-Evaluation
Evaluation Items
Score
Evaluation Items And Scoring Results
A. Participation in the Company’s operation
4 items
5.00
B. Understanding of the functional committees’ responsibilities
7 items
5.00
C. Improvement in the functional committees’ decision-making quality
7 items
5.00
D. Composition of the functional committees and election of members
3 items
5.00
E. Internal control
3 items
5.00
Total
24 items
5.00
(F)Improving measures: Based on the performance evaluations of the Board of Directors and its functional committees, which received scores ranging from 5 (“Very excellent”) to 4 (“Excellent”), the results indicate that both the Board and the committees are operating effectively. The Company will continue to refine and strengthen the Board’s functions in line with the evaluation results to further enhance corporate governance.
(G)The results of the 2024 performance evaluation have been submitted to the 4th report of the sixth session of the Board of Directors on March 6, 2025.